Lanthanide oxides in heterogeneous catalysis
DOI (Low Temperature Physics):
https://doi.org/10.1063/10.0046488Ключові слова:
lanthanide oxides, heterogeneous catalysis, surface chemistry, oxygen vacancies, gas-phase reactionsАнотація
Огляд присвячено застосуванню оксидів лантаноїдів (La2O3, CeO2, Pr6O11, Nd2O3, Sm2O3, Eu2O3, Gd2O3, Tb4O7, Dy2O3, Ho2O3, Er2O3, Yb2O3 та Lu2O3) як твердотільних каталізаторів для реакцій, що мають важливе екологічне значення. Встановлено загальні закономірності, що визначають як каталітичну ефективність, так і стабільність каталізаторів на основі оксидів лантаноїдів, що є важливою інформацією для їхнього застосування в гетерогенному каталізі. Оскільки більшість наявних досліджень каталізаторів на основі оксидів рідкісноземельних елементів зосереджена на CeO2, у цій роботі основну увагу приділено іншим оксидам цього ряду.
Посилання
1. K. Xu, J.-C. Liu, W.-W. Wang, L.-L. Zhou, C. Ma, X. Guan, F. R. Wang, J. Li, C.-J. Jia, and C.-H. Yan, “Catalytic properties of trivalent rare-earth oxides with intrinsic surface oxygen vacancy,” Nat. Commun. 15, 5751 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49981-9
2. W. Patkowski, M. Zybert, H. Ronduda, and W. Raróg-Pilecka, “Lanthanide oxides in ammonia synthesis catalysts: A comprehensive review, MDPI,” Catalysts 13, 1464 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13121464
3. S. Pravitha, S. Priyanka, D. Devadathan, and R. Raveendran, “A review of functional rare earth metal oxides: Synthesis strategies, properties, and emerging applications,” Coord. Chem. Rev. 558, 217767 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2026.217767
4. A. Trovarelli, and J. Llorca, “Ceria catalysts at nanoscale: How do crystal shapes shape catalysis?,” ACS Catal. 7, 4716 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b01246
5. X. Garcia, L. Soler, N. J. Divins, X. Vendrell, I. Serrano, I. Lucentini, J. Prat, E. Solano, M. Tallarida, C. Escudero, and J. Llorca, “Ceria-based catalysts studied by near ambient pressure x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: A review, MDPI,” Catalysts 10, 286 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10030286
6. Z. Hou, W. Pei, X. Zhang, K. Zhang, Y. Liu, J. Deng, L. Jing, and H. Dai, “Rare earth oxides and their supported noble metals in application of environmental catalysis,” J. Rare Earths 38, 819 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jre.2020.01.011
7. J. Liu, I. A. W. Filot, Y. Su, B. Zijlstra, and E. J. M. Hensen, “Optimum particle size for gold-catalyzed CO oxidation,” J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 8327 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b12711
8. B. Han, H. Li, L. Li, Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, and G. Li, “Kinetic control of CeO2 nanoparticles for catalytic CO oxidation,” J. Mater. Res. 34, 2201 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2018.456
9. D. Valechha, S. Lokhande, M. Klementova, J. Subrt, S. Rayalu, and N. Labhsetwar, “Study of nano-structured ceria for catalytic CO oxidation,” J. Mater. Chem. 21, 3718 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/c0jm03267k
10. G. Spezzati, A. D. Benavidez, A. T. DeLaRiva, Y. Su, J. P. Hofmann, S. Asahina, E. J. Olivier, J. H. Neethling, J. T. Miller, A. K. Datye, and E. J. M. Hensen, “CO oxidation by Pd supported on CeO2(100) and CeO2(111) facets,” Appl. Catal. B 243, 36 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.10.015
11. T. Uchiyama, H. Yoshida, Y. Kuwauchi, S. Ichikawa, S. Shimada, M. Haruta, and S. Takeda, “Systematic morphology changes of gold nanoparticles supported on CeO2 during CO oxidation,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 10157 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201102487
12. Z. Hu, Z. Wang, Y. Guo, L. Wang, Y. Guo, J. Zhang, and W. Zhan, “Total oxidation of propane over a Ru/CeO2 catalyst at low temperature,” Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 9531 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03448
13. Z. Wang, Z. T. Huang, J. Brosnahan, S. Zhang, Y. Guo, Y. Guo, L. Wang, Y. Wang, and W. Zhan, “Ru/CeO2 catalyst with optimized CeO2 support morphology and surface facets for propane combustion,” Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 5349 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01929
14. O. Bezkrovnyi, M. Vorokhta, M. Pawlyta, M. Ptak, L. Piliai, X. Xie, T. N. Dinhová, I. Khalakhan, I. Matolínová, and L. Kepinski, “In situ observation of highly oxidized Ru species in Ru/CeO2 catalyst under propane oxidation,” J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 10, 16675 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2TA02330J
15. M. Lykaki, E. Papista, N. Kaklidis, S. A. C. Carabineiro, and M. Konsolakis, “Ceria nanoparticles’ morphological effects on the N2O decomposition performance of Co3O4/CeO2 mixed oxides,” Catalysts 9, 233 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9030233
16. O. Bezkrovnyi, N. J. Divins, I. Serrano, X. Garcia, P. Kraszkiewicz, M. Ptak, M. Pawlyta, L. Kępiński, and J. Llorca, “Anticoking effect of Eu3+ doping of the Ru/ceria catalyst in the MSR reaction for hydrogen generation,” J. Phys. Chem. C 129, 18513 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5c05324
17. G. Sorbino, A. Di Benedetto, C. Italiano, M. Thomas, A. Vita, G. Ruoppolo, and G. Landi, “Novel Ni–Ru/CeO2 catalysts for low-temperature steam reforming of methane,” Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 137, 961 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.07.385
18. A. Baudh, M. Garjola, R. Sharma, S. Sharma, and R. K. Upadhyay, “Effect of ceria morphology on hydrogen production via methane steam reforming for membrane reformer,” Can. J. Chem. Eng. 102, 3803 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.25396
19. X. Yang, J. Da, H. Yu, and H. Wang, “Characterization and performance evaluation of Ni-based catalysts with Ce promoter for methane and hydrocarbons steam reforming process,” Fuel 179, 353 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.03.104
20. A. Salcedo, P. G. Lustemberg, N. Rui, R. M. Palomino, Z. Liu, S. Nemsak, S. D. Senanayake, J. A. Rodriguez, M. V. Ganduglia-Pirovano, and B. Irigoyen, “Reaction pathway for coke-free methane steam reforming on a Ni/ CeO2 catalyst: Active sites and the role of metal-support interactions,” ACS Catal. 11, 8327 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c01604
21. U. E. S. Amjad, C. W. M. Quintero, G. Ercolino, C. Italiano, A. Vita, and S. Specchia, “Methane steam reforming on the Pt/CeO2 catalyst: Effect of daily start-up and shut-down on long-term stability of the catalyst,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58, 16395 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b02436
22. S. López-Rodríguez, A. Davó-Quiñonero, E. Bailón-García, D. Lozano-Castelló, and A. Bueno-López, “Effect of Ru loading on Ru/CeO2 catalysts for CO2 methanation,” Mol. Catal. 515, 111911 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2021.111911
23. F. Wang, S. He, H. Chen, B. Wang, L. Zheng, M. Wei, D. G. Evans, and X. Duan, “Active site dependent reaction mechanism over Ru/CeO2 catalyst toward CO2 methanation,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 6298 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b02762
24. A. Ayub, H. Bahruji, and A. H. Mahadi, “Ni nanoparticles on reducible metal oxides (Sm2O3, CeO2, ZnO) as catalysts for CO2 methanation,” Bull. Chem. React. Eng. Catal. 16, 641 (2021). https://doi.org/10.9767/bcrec.16.3.10948.641-650
25. S. V. Ushakov, S. Hayun, W. Gong, and A. Navrotsky, “Thermal analysis of high-entropy rare earth oxides,” Materials 13, 3141 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13143141
26. O. Bezkrovnyi, “Comprehensive H2-TPR study of the lanthanide oxides reducibility,” J. Clust. Sci. 36, 168 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10876-025-02900-4
27. X. Zhang, S. Cheng, W. Zhang, C. Zhang, N. E. Drewett, X. Wang, D. Wang, S. J. Yoo, J. G. Kim, and W. Zheng, “Mechanistic insight into nanoarchitected Ag/Pr6O11 catalysts for efficient CO oxidation,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 56, 11042 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b02530
28. S. Sato, R. Takahashi, M. Kobune, and H. Gotoh, “Basic properties of rare earth oxides,” Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 356, 57 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2008.12.019
29. T. Jiang, J. Song, M. Huo, N. T. Yang, J. Liu, J. Zhang, Y. Sun, and Y. Zhu, “La2o3 catalysts with diverse spatial dimensionality for oxidative coupling of methane to produce ethylene and ethane,” RSC Adv. 6, 34872 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA01805J
30. A. Burrows, C. J. Kiely, G. J. Hutchings, R. W. Joyner, and M. Y. Sinev, “Structure/function relationships in Nd2O3-doped MgO catalysts for the methane coupling reaction,” J. Catal. 167, 77 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.1997.1591
31. R. Javaid, Y. Aoki, and T. Nanba, “Highly efficient Ru/MgO–Er2O3 catalysts for ammonia synthesis,” J. Phys. Chem. Solids 146, 109570 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2020.109570
32. R. Li, L. Liu, X. Ju, J. Feng, J. Wang, J. Guo, T. He, and P. Chen, “Interaction between Ru nanoparticles and Pr6O11 triggers catalytic ammonia synthesis,” Catal. Lett. 154, 4814 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-024-04629-7
33. C. Li, Y. Gong, Y. Yang, H. Lu, L. Z. Wu, and J. Wang, “Oxygen vacancy-rich Pr6O11: Unlocking superior catalytic support for efficient ammonia synthesis,” J. Mater. Chem. A 13, 29306 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1039/D5TA03382A
34. C. Au, Q. Zhang, C. Ng, and H. Wan, “Oxidative coupling of methane over LaF3/La2O3,” Catalysts 23, 377 (1994).
35. J. Yue, Q. Xiao, D. Zhao, Y. Guan, J. Liu, and G. Xu, “Surfactant-assisted preparation of nanorod La2O3 catalysts for oxidative coupling of methane,” Energy Fuels 37, 15986 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c02246
36. T. W. Elkins, B. Neumann, M. Bäumer, and H. E. Hagelin-Weaver, “Effects of Li doping on MgO-supported Sm2O3 and TbOx catalysts in the oxidative coupling of methane,” ACS Catal. 4, 1972 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/cs500138j
37. D. G. Filkova, L. A. Petrov, M. Y. Sinev, and Y. P. Tyulenin, “Effect of the method of preparation of a Nd2O3-MgO catalyst on its efficiency in the reaction of oxidative coupling of methane,” Catal. Lett. 13, 323 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00765034
38. C. A. Chirinos, S. Liu, V. Cortés Corberán, and L. M. Gómez-Sainero, “Effect of Sm2O3 doping of CeO2-supported Ni catalysts for H2 production by steam reforming of ethanol,” Catalysts 15, 131 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15020131
39. L. M. Gómez-Sainero, R. T. Baker, A. J. Vizcaíno, S. M. Francis, J. A. Calles, I. S. Metcalfe, and J. J. Rodriguez, “Steam reforming of methanol with Sm2O3–CeO2-supported palladium catalysts: Influence of the thermal treatments of catalyst and support,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48, 8364 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie900630z
40. J. C. Fierro-Gonzalez, V. A. Bhirud, and B. C. Gates, “A highly active catalyst for CO oxidation at 298 K: Mononuclear Au III complexes anchored to La2O3 nanoparticles,” Chem. Commun. 42, 5275 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1039/b509629d
41. J. D. Lessard, I. Valsamakis, and M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, “Novel Au/La2O3 and Au/La2O2SO4 catalysts for the water-gas shift reaction prepared via an anion adsorption method,” Chem. Commun. 48, 4857 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cc31105d
42. M. Mosinska, W. Maniukiewicz, M. I. Szynkowska-Jozwik, and P. Mierczynski, “Influence of NiO/La2O3 catalyst preparation method on its reactivity in the oxy-steam reforming of LNG process,” Catalysts 11, 1174 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11101174
43. R. Velinova, N. Kaneva, G. Ivanov, D. Kovacheva, I. Spassova, S. Todorova, G. Atanasova, and A. Naydenov, “Synthesis and characterization of Pd/La2O3/ZnO catalyst for complete oxidation of methane, propane and butane,” Inorganics 13, 17 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics13010017
44. Q. Wu, J. Xiong, X. Mei, Y. Zhang, Y. Wei, Y. Zhao, Z. Liu, and J. Li, “Efficient catalysts of La2O3 nanorod-supported Pt nanoparticles for soot oxidation The role of La2O3-{110} facets,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58, 7074 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b01018
45. F. S. Al-Sultan, S. N. Basahel, and K. Narasimharao, “Catalytic oxidative cracking of N-propane over nanosized gold supported La2O3 catalysts,” Fuel 233, 796 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.06.130
46. X. Zhang, L. Liu, J. Wang, X. Ju, R. Si, J. Feng, J. Guo, and P. Chen, “The role of lanthanum hydride species in La2O3 supported Ru cluster catalyst for ammonia synthesis,” J. Catal. 417, 382 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2022.12.016
47. Y. Yu, Y. M. Gan, C. Huang, Z. H. Lu, X. Wang, R. Zhang, and G. Feng, “Ni/La2O3 and Ni/MgO–La2O3 catalysts for the decomposition of NH3 into hydrogen,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45, 16528 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.127
48. M. Grabchenko, G. Pantaleo, F. Puleo, O. Vodyankina, and L. F. Liotta, “Ni/La2O3 catalysts for dry reforming of methane: Effect of La2O3 synthesis conditions on the structural properties and catalytic performances,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 46, 7939 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.026
49. S. Li, A. Ding, W. Zhang, Z. Xie, M. P. Papini, Y. Xuan, and H. Zheng, “Three-dimensionally ordered macroporous La2O3-supported Ni catalyst for methane dry reforming,” Catalysts 15, 992 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15100992
50. J. C. Conesa, “Computer modeling of surfaces and defects on cerium dioxide,” Surf. Sci. 339, 337 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028(95)00595-1
51. O. S. Bezkrovnyi, P. Kraszkiewicz, M. Ptak, and L. Kepinski, “Thermally induced reconstruction of ceria nanocubes into zigzag {111}-nanofacetted structures and its influence on catalytic activity in CO oxidation,” Catal. Commun. 117, 94 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2018.08.005
52. M. Fronzi, A. Soon, B. Delley, E. Traversa, and C. Stampfl, “Stability and morphology of cerium oxide surfaces in an oxidizing environment: A first-principles investigation,” J. Chem. Phys. 131, 104701 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3191784
53. P. A. Crozier, R. Wang, and R. Sharma, “In situ environmental TEM studies of dynamic changes in cerium-based oxides nanoparticles during redox processes,” Ultramicroscopy 108, 1432 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2008.05.015
54. M. Tinoco, S. Fernández-García, M. López-Haro, A. B. Hungría, X. Chen, G. Blanco, J. Pérez-Omil, S. E. Collins, H. Okuno, and J. J. Calvino, “Critical influence of nanofaceting on the preparation and performance of supported gold catalysts,” ACS Catal. 5, 3504 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5b00086
55. S. Fernández-García, S. E. Collins, M. Tinoco, A. B. Hungría, J. J. Calvino, M. A. Cauqui, and X. Chen, “Influence of {111} nanofaceting on the dynamics of CO adsorption and oxidation over Au supported on CeO2 nanocubes An operando DRIFT insight,” Catal. Today 336, 90 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2019.01.078
56. F. Jiang, S. Wang, B. Liu, J. Liu, L. Wang, Y. Xiao, Y. Xu, and X. Liu, “Insights into the influence of CeO2 crystal facet on CO2 hydrogenation to methanol over Pd/CeO2 catalysts,” ACS Catal. 10, 11493 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c03324
57. X. Garcia, L. Soler, X. Vendrell, I. Serrano, F. Herrera, J. Prat, E. Solano, M. Tallarida, J. Llorca, and C. Escudero, “Operando NAP-XPS studies of a ceria-supported Pd catalyst for CO oxidation,” Chemistry 5, 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry5010001
58. T. Montini, M. Melchionna, M. Monai, and P. Fornasiero, “Fundamentals and catalytic applications of CeO2-based materials,” Chem. Rev. 116, 5987 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00603
59. Y. Borchert, P. Sonström, M. Wilhelm, H. Borchert, and M. Bäumer, “Nanostructured praseodymium oxide: Preparation, structure, and catalytic properties,” J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 3054 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0768524
60. P. X. Huang, F. Zhu, B. L. Li, G. R. Wang, Y. L. Gao, X. P. Zhu, H. Y. Yan, W. P. Huang, S. M. Zhang, and D. Y. Song, “Praseodymium hydroxide and oxide nanorods and Au/Pr6O11 nanorod catalysts for CO oxidation,” J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 1614 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp055622r
61. H. Li, Q. Pan, J. Liu, W. Li, Q. Wang, and Z. Wang, “Synthesis and catalytic properties of praseodymium oxide (Pr6O11) nanorods for diesel soot oxidation,” J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 11, 109145 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.109145
62. X. Zhang, L. Liu, J. Feng, X. Ju, J. Wang, T. He, and P. Chen, “Ru nanoparticles on Pr2O3 as an efficient catalyst for hydrogen production from ammonia decomposition,” Catal. Lett. 152, 1170 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-021-03709-2
63. H. Ronduda, M. Lemańska, W. Patkowski, A. Ostrowski, K. Sobczak, and W. Raróg-Pilecka, “Role of the active metal (Fe, Co and Ni) on the activity of Nd2O3-supported catalysts for ammonia synthesis,” Catal. Today 461, 115535 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2025.115535
64. S. Han Lee, D. Woon Jung, J. D. Kim, and Y.-R. Kim, “Effect of altervalent cation doping on catalytic activity of neodymium sesquioxide for oxidative coupling of methane,” J. Catal. 164, 159 (1997).https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(97)00166-X
65. D. Duan, C. Hao, L. Wang, M. Adil, W. Shi, H. Wang, L. Gao, X. Song, and Z. Sun, “Novel nanorod Au/Sm2O3 catalyst synthesized by dealloying combined with calcination for low-temperature CO oxidation,” J. Alloys Compd. 818, 152882 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152879
66. J. Ilsemann, A. Sonström, T. M. Gesing, R. Anwander, and M. Bäumer, “Highly active Sm2O3–Ni xerogel catalysts for CO2 methanation,” Chem. Cat. Chem. 11, 1732 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201802049
67. J. Zhao, X. Liu, Z. Li, K. Feng, Y. Pan, P. Ji, K. Zhao, B. Yan, D. Zhou, and D. Su, “Tuning the CO2 hydrogenation activity via regulating the strong metal-support interactions of the Ni/Sm2O3 catalyst,” ACS Catal. 14, 3158 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.3c06345
68. N. A. Ayub, H. Bahruji, and A. H. Mahadi, “Barium-promoted Ni/Sm2O3 catalysts for enhanced CO2 methanation,” RSC Adv. 11, 31807 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA04115K
69. J. S. H. Q. Perera, J. W. Couves, G. Sankar, and J. M. Thomas, “The catalytic activity of Ru and Ir supported on Eu2O3 for the reaction CO2 + CH4 ⇌ 2H2 + 2CO: A viable solar-thermal energy system,” Catal. Lett. 11, 205 (1991).https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00764088
70. J. Wang, L. Liu, J. Feng, X. Zhang, X. Ju, and P. Chen, “Regulating the interaction of Ru nanoparticles and an Eu2O3 support achieves enhanced activity for ammonia synthesis,” Catal. Sci. Technol. 12, 5339 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CY00646D
71. A. Perechodjuk, V. A. Kondratenko, H. Lund, N. Rockstroh, and E. V. Kondratenko, “Oxides of lanthanoids can catalyse non-oxidative propane dehydrogenation: Mechanistic concept and application potential of Eu2O3- or Gd2O3-based catalysts,” Chem. Commun. 56, 13021 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CC05496H
72. C. T. Au, K. D. Chen, and C. F. Ng, “The modification of Gd2O3 with BaO for the oxidative coupling of methane reactions,” Appl. Catal. A Gen. 170, 81 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(98)00051-9
73. X. Ju, L. Liu, X. Xu, J. Wang, T. He, and P. Chen, “Strong metal-support interaction modulates catalytic activity of Ru nanoparticles on Gd2O3 for efficient ammonia decmposition,” iScience 27, 110931 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.110931
74. Y. Wu, H. Wang, F. S. Xiao, and Z. Wu, “Gadolinium-mediated oxygen affinity induced efficient co-valorization of CH4 and N2O in an Ir–Gd2O3 single-atom catalyst,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 25787 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5c07233
75. Y. Zhang, J. Deng, H. Zhang, Y. Liu, and H. Dai, “Three-dimensionally ordered macroporous Pr6O11 and Tb4O7 with mesoporous walls: Preparation, characterization, and catalytic activity for CO oxidation,” Catal. Today 245, 28 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2014.09.017
76. Y. F. Jiang, C. Z. Yuan, T. Y. Cheang, and A. W. Xu, “Highly active and durable Pd nanocatalyst promoted by an oxygen-deficient terbium oxide (Tb4O7−x) support for hydrogenation and cross-coupling reactions,” New J. Chem. 43, 9210 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NJ01966A
77. C. Bernal, J. J. Calvino, G. A. Cifredo, J. M. Gatica, C. Larese, and J. M. Pintado, “The terbium oxide as a support for highly dispersed metals: Study of the Rh/TbOx catalytic system,” J. Alloys Compd. 225(1–2), 633 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-8388(94)07136-5
78. A. W. Xu, Y. P. Fang, L. P. You, and H. Q. Liu, “A simple method to synthesize Dy(OH)3 and Dy2O3 nanotubes,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 1494 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja029181q
79. H. Hashtroudi, A. Yu, S. Juodkazis, and M. Shafiei, “Two-dimensional Dy2O3–Pd–PDA/RGO heterojunction nanocomposite: Synergistic effects of hybridisation, UV illumination and relative humidity on hydrogen gas sensing,” Chemosensors 10, 60 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors10020078
80. R. Luo, R. Wang, Z. Meng, Y. Xia, and H. Tang, “Dysprosium-induced FeNx–Dy2O3 sites for efficient bifunctional oxygen electrocatalytic reactions for Zn-air batteries,” Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 6, 105 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-023-00685-6
81. W. Du, X. Wang, H. Li, D. Ma, S. Hou, J. Zhang, X. Qian, and H. Pang, “Zro2/Dy2O3 solid solution nanomaterials: Tunable composition, visible light-responsive photocatalytic activities and reaction mechanism,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 96, 2979 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.12414
82. C. Mele and B. Bozzini, “Electrodeposition of a Au-Dy2O3 composite solid oxide fuel cell catalyst from eutectic urea/choline chloride ionic liquid,” Energies 5, 5363 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3390/en5125363
83. Y. Fan, C. Miao, Y. Yue, W. Hua, and Z. Gao, “Nanosheet-like Ho2O3 and Sr-Ho2O3 catalysts for oxidative coupling of methane,” Catalysts 11, 314 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11030314
84. Y. Fan, M. Sun, C. Miao, Y. Yue, W. Hua, and Z. Gao, “Morphology effects of nanoscale Er2O3 and Sr-Er2O3 catalysts for oxidative coupling of methane,” Catal. Lett. 151, 2197 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-020-03503-6
85. C. M. Cho, N. Nunotani, and N. Imanaka, “Direct decomposition of N2O over C-type cubic Yb2O3–Co3O4 catalysts,” Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 92, 1148 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.20190058
86. A. Jan, J. Shin, J. Ahn, S. Yang, K. J. Yoon, J. W. Son, H. Kim, J. H. Lee, and H. I. Ji, “Promotion of Pt/CeO2 catalyst by hydrogen treatment for low-temperature CO oxidation,” RSC Adv. 9, 27002 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA05965B
87. L. Piliai, P. Matvija, T. N. Dinhová, I. Khalakhan, T. Skála, Z. Doležal, O. Bezkrovnyi, L. Kepinski, M. Vorokhta, and I. Matolínová, “In situ spectroscopy and microscopy insights into the CO oxidation mechanism on Au/CeO2(111),” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 56280 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c15792
88. O. Bezkrovnyi, P. Kraszkiewicz, W. Miśta, and L. Kepinski, “The sintering of Au nanoparticles on flat {100}, {111} and zigzagged {111} nanofacetted structures of ceria and its influence on catalytic activity in CO oxidation and CO PROX,” Catal. Lett. 151, 1080 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-020-03370-1
89. H. T. Chen, “First-principles study of CO adsorption and oxidation on Ru-doped CeO2(111) surface,” J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 6239 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp210864m
90. K. K. Chakarova, B. S. Karapenchev, N. L. Drenchev, E. Z. Ivanova, H. A. Aleksandrov, D. A. Panayotov, M. Y. Mihaylov, G. N. Vayssilov, and K. I. Hadjiivanov, “FTIR study of low-temperature CO adsorption on reduced ceria nanoparticles with different morphology: A comparison with oxidized samples,” J. Catal. 443, 115986 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2025.115986
91. X. Wang, M. Chen, X. Qin, B. Li, X. Chen, J. Zhang, K. Li, and C. Zhang, “Enhanced activity of CO oxidation at room temperature by tuning the metal-support interaction of Ru/CeO2 catalyst,” J. Environ. Sci. 154, 436 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2024.07.021
92. W. Wang, D. Li, H. Yu, C. Liu, C. Tang, J. Chen, J. Lu, and M. Luo, “Insights into different reaction behaviors of propane and CO oxidation over Pt/CeO2 and Pt/Nb2O5: The crucial roles of support properties,” J. Phys. Chem. C 125, 19301 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c05459
93. T. N. Dinhová, O. Bezkrovnyi, L. Piliai, I. Khalakhan, S. Chakraborty, M. Ptak, P. Kraszkiewicz, M. Vaidulych, M. Mazur, Š Vajda, L. Kepinski, M. Vorokhta, and I. Matolínová, “Unraveling the effects of reducing and oxidizing pretreatments and humidity on the surface chemistry of the Ru/CeO2 catalyst during propane oxidation,” J. Phys. Chem. C 129, 1746 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c08033
94. D. Duan, C. Hao, W. Shi, H. Wang, and Z. Sun, “Sm2o3/Co3O4 catalysts prepared by dealloying for low-temperature CO oxidation,” RSC Adv. 8, 11289 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA01219A
95. T. Baidya, T. Murayama, S. Nellaiappan, N. K. Katiyar, P. Bera, O. Safonova, M. Lin, K. R. Priolkar, S. Kundu, B. S. Rao, P. Steiger, S. Sharma, K. Biswas, S. K. Pradhan, N. Lingaiah, K. D. Malviya, and M. Haruta, “Ultra-low-temperature CO oxidation activity of octahedral site cobalt species in Co3O4-based catalysts: Unravelling the origin of the unique catalytic property,” J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 19557 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b04136
96. L. A. Bruce, M. Hoang, A. E. Hughes, and T. W. Turney, “Characterization of supported ruthenium catalysts derived from reaction of Ru3(CO)12 with rare earth oxides,” J. Catal. 178, 84 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.1998.2129
97. S. Chrétien, and H. Metiu, “Hydrogen dissociative adsorption on lanthana: Polaron formation and the role of acid-base interactions,” J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 19876 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05310
98. P. H. Hong, H. C. Anh, N. Tri, N. P. Anh, and L. C. Loc, “Effect of support on stability and coke resistance of Ni-based catalyst in combined steam and CO2 reforming of CH4,” ACS Omega 7, 20092 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c01931
99. A. C. S. F. Santos, S. Damyanova, G. N. R. Teixeira, L. V. Mattos, F. B. Noronha, F. B. Passos, and J. M. C. Bueno, “The effect of ceria content on the performance of Pt/CeO2/Al2O3 catalysts in the partial oxidation of methane,” Appl. Catal. A 290, 123 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2005.05.015
100. A. N. T. Cao, H. H. Nguyen, T.-P. T. Pham, L. K. H. Pham, D. H. Le Phuong, N. A. Nguyen, D.-V. N. Vo, Phuong T. H. Pham, “Insight into the role of material basicity in the coke formation and performance of Ni/Al2O3 catalyst for the simulated biogas dry reforming,” J. Energy Inst. 108, 101252 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2023.101252
101. P. Sirous Rezaei, H. Shafaghat, and W. M. A. W. Daud, “Suppression of coke formation and enhancement of aromatic hydrocarbon production in catalytic fast pyrolysis of cellulose over different zeolites: Effects of pore structure and acidity,” RSC Adv. 5, 65408 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA11332F
102. S. Wang and M. Lu, “Catalytic activities and coking characteristics of oxide-supported Ni catalysts for CH4 reforming with CO2,” Energy Fuels 12, 248 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef970092m
103. M. A. A. Aziz, A. A. Jalil, S. Wongsakulphasatch, and D. V. N. Vo, “Understanding the role of surface basic sites of catalysts in CO2 activation in dry reforming of methane: A short review,” Catal. Sci. Technol. 10, 35 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CY01519A
104. A. Demourgues, R. L. Neale, D. C. Sayle, U. Castanet, F. Caddeo, J. M. Flitcroft, R. Caygill, B. J. Pointon, M. Molinari, and J. Majimel, “Controlling the {111}/{110} surface ratio of cuboidal ceria nanoparticles,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 11384 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b21667
105. T. Masui, R. Nagai, and N. Imanaka, “Effect of the introduction of oxide ion vacancies into cubic fluorite-type rare earth oxides on the NO decomposition catalysis,” J. Solid State Chem. 220, 181 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2014.08.029
106. O. Bezkrovnyi, M. A. Małecka, R. Lisiecki, V. Ostroushko, A. G. Thomas, S. Gorantla, and L. Kepinski, “The effect of Eu doping on the growth, structure and redox activity of ceria nanocubes,” Cryst. Eng. Comm. 20, 1698 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CE00155C
107. N. Ta, J. Liu, S. Chenna, P. A. Crozier, Y. Li, A. Chen, and W. Shen, “Stabilized gold nanoparticles on ceria nanorods by strong interfacial anchoring,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 20585 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja310341j
